Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 567 F.3d 1278 - Abdur-Rahman v. Walker

Abdur-Rahman v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

567 F.3d 1278 · 2009

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
September 2024
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2024 · most notably 134 S. Ct. 2369 - Lane v. Franks (2014), Lane v. Franks (2014)

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

290200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Garcetti v. Ceballos · Maine v. Thiboutot · Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]ven if an employee was not required to make the speech as part of his official duties, he enjoys no First Amendment protection if his speech 'owes its existence to [the] employee's professional responsibilities' and is 'a product that the”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[f]ormal job descriptions often bear little resemblance to the duties an employee actually is expected to perform, and the listing of a given task in an employee's written job description is neither necessary nor sufficient”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[s]peech that owes its existence to the official duties of public employees is not citizen speech even if those duties can be described so narrowly as not to mandate the act of speaking”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.