Chira v. Saal’s Empirical Analysis
567 F.3d 1307 · 2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 365
Relies on Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. · Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd. · Martin v. Kane · AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City of Atlanta · Byrd v. Gardinier, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) The probability of success in the litigation; (b) the difficulties, if any, to be encountered in the matter of collection; (c) the complexity of the litigation involved, and the expense, inconvenience and delay necessarily attending it; (d) the paramount interest of the creditors and a proper deference to their reasonable views in the premises.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Courts consider these factors to determine 'the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of a proposed settlement agreement.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Morgan“On motion by the trustee and after notice and a hearing, the court may approve a compromise or settlement....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.