Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 567 F.3d 246 - Smith v. Mitchell

Smith v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

567 F.3d 246 · 2009

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably Littlejohn v. Trammell (2013), United States v. Lawrence (2013)

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

220200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Williams v. Taylor · Gregg v. Georgia · Furman v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the likelihood that the remarks of the prosecutor tended to mislead the jury or prejudice the defendant; (2) whether the remarks were isolated or extensive; (3) whether the remarks were deliberately or accidentally made; and (4) the total strength of the evidence against the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.