Scott v. Schriro’s Empirical Analysis
567 F.3d 573 · 2009
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Murdoch v. Castro (2010), Sivak v. Hardison (2011)
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Blakely v. Washington · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Ring v. Arizona · Picard v. Connor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Full and fair presentation ... requires a petitioner to present the substance of his claim to the state courts, including a reference to a federal constitutional guarantee and a statement of facts that entitle the petitioner to relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sivak v. Hardison“The plea offer's mitigatory effect is clear: the prosecution thought this was not a clear-cut death penalty case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.