United States v. Berkeley’s Empirical Analysis
567 F.3d 703 · 2009
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Booker · Gall v. United States · Hill v. Lockhart · Cuyler v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n entrapment defense may form the basis for a viable claim of innocence[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“can show a fair and just reason for requesting the withdrawal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.