Pyke v. Cuomo’s Empirical Analysis
567 F.3d 74 · 2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Torraco v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (2010), 959 F. Supp. 2d 540 - Floyd v. City of New York (2013)
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Washington v. Davis · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Morton v. Mancari · Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by pointing to [1] a law that expressly classifies on the basis of [religion], [2] a facially neutral law or policy that has been applied in an unlawfully discriminatory manner, or [3] a facially neutral policy that has an adverse effect and that was motivated by discriminatory animus.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“appropriate only if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.