De Jesus v. Acevedo’s Empirical Analysis
567 F.3d 941 · 2009
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
April 2013
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jimenez v. Quarterman · Fernandez v. Sternes · Escamilla v. Jungwirth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The time during which a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted toward any period of limitation under this subsection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Griffith v. Rednour“A state’s decision to accept an untimely filing does not justify back-dating that filing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.