Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 567 FSUPP 128 - Foster v. CBS, INC.

Foster v. CBS, INC.’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2002
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Horton v. Liberty Mutual Insurance · Janzen v. Goos · Slater v. KFC Corp. · Crenshaw v. Great Central Insurance · Euge v. Trantina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a false material representation, (2) the speaker's knowledge of its falsity or his ignorance of its truth, (3) the speaker's intent that it should be acted upon by the hearer in a manner reasonably contemplated, (4) the hearer's ignorance of the falsity of the statement, (5) the hearer's reliance on its truth and the right to rely thereon, and (6) proximate injury resulting from the false statements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.