Procup v. Strickland’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. · American Sterilizer Co. v. Sybron Corp. · Rice v. Norman Williams Co. · Bradley v. J. F. Batte & Sons of Richmond, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Order to Show Cause, permitting plaintiff thirty days in which to demonstrate why the Court should not enter an injunction prohibiting him from filing any further pleadings in the courts of this district.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Procup v. Strickland“any additional cases or pleadings therein ... unless ... submitted on behalf of Procup by an attorney admitted to practice before this Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Procup v. Strickland“ample incentive for members of the increasingly large private bar to handle a claim which appears to be meritorious.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Procup v. Strickland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.