Beecher v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1998
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · Francis v. Franklin · Yamanis v. United States · Good Hope Chemical Corp. Creditors' Committee v. Koerver · Heald v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State is only required to produce such evidence as will satisfy the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime charged was committed by the Defendant with the degree of culpability charged in the information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holliday v. State“[the Defendant is not required to present any evidence to prove his innocence or to prove or explain anything”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holliday v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.