In re Haynes’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “justify [taking] ... client's funds in a manner not consistent with Rule 1.15, for however short a time.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In re Helmer

2. “in a manner not consistent with [the Respondent and client's] understanding and established procedure.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In re Helmer