Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 567 N.W.2d 29 - Schaefer v. Weber

Schaefer v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2013

6 state decisions

30199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland · County of Anoka v. Richards · Hennepin County v. Geshick · County of Isanti v. Formhals · Isanti County Family Services & Welfare Department Ex Rel. Edwardh v. Swanson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “strong state policy of assuring that children have the adequate and timely economic support of their parents,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the unnecessary drain of scarce social service and judicial resources.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.