Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 567 Pa. 492 - Commonwealth v. Beam

Commonwealth v. Beam’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Phillips v. A-Best Products Co. · Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy Ghost · Commonwealth v. Booth · Game Com'n v. Dept. of Env. Resources · Salazar v. Allstate Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Legislative enactments are generally to be construed in such a manner as to effect their objects and promote justice, see 1 Pa. C.S. § 1928(c), and, in assessing a statute, courts are directed to consider the consequences of a particular interpretation, as well as other factors enumerated in the Statutory Construction Act.... Based upon such considerations, the rule requiring express legislative delegation is tempered by the recognition that an administrative agency is invested with the implied authority necessary to the effectuation of its express mandates.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[ W]hen the legislature statutorily invests an agency with certain functions, duties, and responsibilities, the agency has a legislatively conferred interest in such matters. From this it must follow that, unless the legislature has provided otherwise, such an agency has an implicit power to be a litigant in matters touching upon its concerns. In such circumstances the legislature has implicitly ordained that such an agency is a proper party litigant, ie., that it has “standing”....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “it is evident from the Aviation Code that the Legislature intended to confer upon the Department an ability to secure compliance with ... statutory requirements”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.