Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 567 SO2D 1064 - Cho v. MacKey

Cho v. MacKey’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 386 So. 2d 520 - Gibson v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc. · 446 So. 2d 97 - Mora v. City of Fort Lauderdale · 318 So. 2d 480 - Matthews v. Williford · 430 So. 2d 503 - Banat v. Armando · 533 So. 2d 1192 - Dunn v. Schurga

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]ne who establishes a remote condition which furnishes only the occasion for another's supervening negligence is not deemed to be a proximate cause of the resulting accident unless the intervening cause was foreseeable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.