Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

567 So. 2d 1073

Milloway v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 16, 1990

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-10-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1991

1 state decisions

Relies on 525 So. 2d 458 - Williams v. State · Brown v. State · Williams v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-10-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The final judgment of conviction and sentence under review is affirmed with two modifications: (1) the amount of restitution ordered by the trial court in the probation order is hereby corrected so as to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement at the sentencing hearing below, to wit: $3,294.14, Williams v. State, 525 So.2d 458, 460 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); A.R. v. State, 475 So.2d 308, 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Brown v. State, 423 So.2d 599, 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); and (2) the directive in the probation order which delegates to the probation officer the determination of the mode and manner of payment of restitution, fees, and costs by the defendant is stricken, as only the trial court may direct a payment schedule for such restitution, fees, and costs. Williams v. State, 556 So.2d 799, 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

¶2Affirmed as modified.

/567/so2d/1073 · .json · Public domain