Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 567 SO2D 215 - Barnwell v. State

Barnwell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State (1997), 616 So. 2d 298 - Noe v. State (1993)

43 state decisions

210199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Solem v. Helm · Rummel v. Estelle · American Petrofina Co. v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union Local No. 4-23 · Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board · Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]part from ... a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole' — or a sentence which is manifestly disproportionate to the crime committed (e.g., life sentence for overtime parking), extended proportionality analysis is not required by the Eighth Amendment.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]here a sentence is within prescribed statutory limits, it will generally be upheld and not regarded as cruel and unusual,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Clowers, by its own statement, is limited to its own distinctive facts and procedural posture.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.