¶1The state correctly concedes that a written order of probation revocation must conform with the court’s oral pronouncements. Salmon v. State, 540 So.2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Williams v. State, 525 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We therefore remand for the entry of a corrected order of probation revocation to conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at the probation revocation hearing; defendant’s probation is revoked solely because he failed to report and perform community service hours required as a condition of probation. Revocation based on the defendant’s commission of four burglaries and thefts should be stricken from the probation revocation order.
567 So. 2d 62
Guerra v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 9, 1990
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-10-09
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1993
2 state decisions
Relies on 525 So. 2d 458 - Williams v. State · 540 So. 2d 922 - Salmon v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1990-10-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →