Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 567 So. 2d 798 - State v. Bay

567 So. 2d 798 - State v. Bay’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 385 So. 2d 248 - State v. Byrd · United States v. Boyd · State v. Bay · 390 So. 2d 504 - State v. Simmons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he defendant’s second degree murder conviction is based upon the same record and the same facts which were before the Louisiana Supreme Court in his original appeal. Defendant has already exercised his right to judicial review guaranteed by Article I, § 19 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974. The only new action in the trial court was the entry of the judgment of guilty of second degree murder and the imposition of the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment at hard labor, as ordered by the Supreme Court. If this court were to allow this defendant a second appeal, then every time an appellate court applies the procedure outlined in Byrd, the defendant would automatically get a second bite of the apple under the same record already appealed. This is not the intention of Byrd. For the above and foregoing reasons, defendant’s appeal is dismissed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “However, when it is clear from the verdict that the trial judge or jury necessarily found the elements of a lesser and included offense had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, and the state, constrained by the double jeopardy clause, cannot seek anew a conviction on the greater offense, a remand for a new trial would serve no useful purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.