567 So. 2d 806 - State v. Owens’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 408 So. 2d 1255 - State v. Dewey · State v. Burdgess · 529 So. 2d 14 - State v. DiLosa · 373 So. 2d 1284 - State v. Bonanno · 538 So. 2d 1010 - State v. DiLosa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A charge of bias or impartiality may be removed if a witness is rehabilitated. A prospective juror can be rehabilitated if the trial court is satisfied that the juror can render an impartial verdict according to the evidence and instructions given by the court. State v. Gibson, 505 So.2d 237 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1987), writ denied, 508 So.2d 66 (La. 1987). The trial court has wide discretion in ruling on a challenge for cause, and its ruling will not be disturbed on appeal absent a showing of abuse of discretion. State v. Gintz, 438 So.2d 1230 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1983).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“testified that her relationship with the victim and her family `might' remain in her mind during the trial and sympathy `might' arise during the trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.