In re Jorge’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Relies on Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon · Hays and Company v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc · Donna Marie Walls, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. · National Gypsum Company Insurance Company of North America v. Ngc Settlement Trust & Asbestos Claims Management Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a general matter, allowing arbitration of contempt proceedings would effectively strip the courts of their primary enforcement mechanism.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Bateman“Verizon mischaracterizes the nature of the claims in the Motion for Contempt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Bateman“any dispute that in any way relates to or arises out of this agreement [.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Bateman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.