Holmes v. Grubman’s Empirical Analysis
568 F.3d 329 · 2009
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 124 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2024 · most notably Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc. (2013), Selevan v. New York Thruway Authority (2009)
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo · McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp. · LoSacco v. City of Middletown · Sims v. Blot
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 124 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all factual allegations in the complaint as true, and draw[ ] all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“good reason, including futility, bad faith, undue delay, or undue prejudice to the opposing party.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Whether good cause exists turns on the diligence of the moving party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.