Rosencrantz v. Lafler’s Empirical Analysis
568 F.3d 577 · 2009
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Lawrence (2013), Wogenstahl v. Mitchell (2012)
13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we do not view this case as the unusual, especially egregious instance of prosecutorial misconduct, or one that reveals any 'pattern of pros-ecutorial misconduct.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“there was 'any reasonable likelihood that the false testimony could have affected the judgment of the jury.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Medina“testified in an indisputably false manner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.