Pangilinan v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
568 F.3d 708 · 2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2022
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales · Agyeman v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Norma Antonia Jacinto and Ronald Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Opinion · Colmenar v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Salgado-Diaz v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“appearing pro se often lack the legal knowledge to navigate their way successfully through the morass of immigration law, and because their failure to do so successfully might result in their expulsion from this country.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“An IJ cannot correct his failure to probe more deeply by simply asking the alien whether he has anything to add in support of his claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.