568 F. Supp. 583 - Riverside Irrigation District v. Andrews’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2000
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1536 (§ 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 33 U.S.C. § 1251 (Alternative Water Sources Act of 2000) · 33 U.S.C. § 1344 · 33 U.S.C. § 1370 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill · Ingraham v. Wright · United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co. · The State of Pennsylvania v. The Wheeling and Belmont Bridge Company et al. · California v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any action authorized, funded, or carried out by such agency ... is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat of such species which is determined by the Secretary ... to be critical.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“congress cannot unilaterally reserve the right to amend or repeal an interstate compact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.