Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 568 P2D 1269 - Bias v. State

Bias v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
8
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Scalza v. United States · State v. Rush · United States v. Dillon · 35 Ill. 2d 24 - People Ex Rel. Conn v. Randolph

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Prospectively, in order to obtain a compensation award above the statuatory amount a lawyer must prove thru clear and convincing evidence that (1) all extraordinary actions were taken in good faith, (2) all extraordinary work performed was necessary, (3) he is unable to maintain his practice, and (4) reasonableness of extraordinary fee.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he statute cannot constitutionally be applied where it appears, as here, that appointed counsel cannot continue to serve because they are suffering an extreme, if not ruinous, loss of practice and income and must expend large out-of-pocket sums in the course of trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the expenditure of 255 hours on a murder case clearly is ... burdensome, considering a lawyer has an average of 1,200 billable hours per year.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.