Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 568 P2D 332 - Holding v. State

Holding v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 1987
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bryant v. State · 61 Okla. Crim. 396 - Williams v. State · Haga v. State · Wade v. State · 77 Okla. Crim. 51 - Weston v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he record of the case will be carefully examined to determine whether the evidence of the prosecutrix is clear and believable and is not inconsistent, incredible or contradictory. If the evidence is such that a jury would be justified in their conclusion, and if the verdict is based upon probable testimony, then this Court will recognize the exclusive province of the jury to weigh the evidence and determine the facts and will not interfere with the jury’s verdict, though there may be a sharp conflict in the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.