Howington v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1993
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Floyd v. State · Woods v. State · 398 So. 2d 762 - Hinshaw v. State · 555 So. 2d 1153 - Garnett v. State · EX PARTE McCRARY
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'When, as here, a trial court immediately charges the jury to disregard improper remarks, there is a prima facie presumption against error. Where a trial court acts promptly to impress upon the jury that improper [remarks] are to be disregarded by them in their deliberations, the prejudicial effects of such remarks are removed.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.