¶1AFFIRMED. See Cobb v. State, 567 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Huff v. State, 566 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Schesny v. State, 564 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Buckley v. State, 558 So.2d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Betsey v. State, 558 So.2d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Thomas v. State, 558 So.2d 129 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Reynolds v. State, 558 So.2d 127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) [J. Zehmer’s concurring opinion]; Jones v. State, 558 So.2d 116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) [J. Zehmer’s specially concurring opinion]; Glass v. State, 556 So.2d 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), review pending, No. 75,600; Carter v. State, 552 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA), approved, 553 So.2d 169, 170, nt. 1 (Fla.1989); Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851, 852, 853 (Fla.1989).
568 So. 2d 522
Bush v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 22, 1990
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-10-22
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1990
3 state decisions
Relies on 545 So. 2d 851 - Franklin v. State · Glass v. State · 553 So. 2d 169 - State v. Carter
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1990-10-22
View the full empirical analysis of this case →