568 So. 2d 554 - State v. Byrd’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
55 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 775 So. 2d 1022 - State v. Casey (2000), 637 So. 2d 1012 - State v. Davis (1994)
55 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Wong Sun v. United States · United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Rakas v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“exists when the facts and circumstances within the affiant's knowledge and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient to support a reasonable belief that an offense has been committed and that evidence or contraband may be found at the place to be searched.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McLemore · State v. Brown“97-2904 at pp. 4-5, 730 So.2d at 1031-32 . Making a material and intentional misrepresentation to a magistrate involves a fraud upon the courts and will result in the invalidation of the warrant and suppression of the items seized. State v. Byrd, 568 So.2d 554 (La.1990); State v. Brown, 93-2089 (La.App. 4 Cir. 12/15/94) , 647 So.2d 1250 , writ den. 95-0497 (La.12/6/96), 684 So.2d 921 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a third-party defendant does not have standing to contest the use of information gathered from a juvenile suspect. State v. Singleton, 376 So.2d 143, 145 (La.1979). More generally, `a person adversely affected by a confession unlawfully obtained from another has no standing to raise its illegality in court.' State v. Burdgess, 434 So.2d 1062, 1064 (La.1983).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.