Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

568 So. 2d 873

Hall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1990-03-16

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2016

8 state decisions

Relies on Harris v. Reed · Smith v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-03-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALA-BAM A SUPREME COURT

McMillan, judge.

¶2In accordance with Ex parte Hall, 557 So.2d 22 (Ala.1990), and Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989), it is determined that this cause was affirmed without opinion because the issues raised by the appellant concerning the voluntariness of his statements and their admission into evidence without a hearing outside of the jury’s presence were procedurally barred because there were no objections in circuit court.

¶3AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.
/568/so2d/873 · .json · Public domain