¶1Affirmed. See Buenoano v. State, 527 So.2d 194 (Fla.1988); Pope v. State, 441 So.2d 1073 (Fla.1983); Eberhard v. State, 539 So.2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Palmer v. State, 486 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Jimenez v. State, 480 So.2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Bradford v. State, 460 So.2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), petition for rev. denied, 467 So.2d 999 (Fla.1985); Knight v. State, 392 So.2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 399 So.2d 1143 (Fla.1981); Garmise v. State, 311 So.2d 747 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), dismissed, 328 So.2d 841 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 998, 97 S.Ct. 524, 50 L.Ed.2d 608 (1976).
568 So. 2d 948
Romer v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 18, 1990
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-09-18
Relies on South Dakota v. Nebraska · 399 So. 2d 1137 - Vey v. Bradford Union Guidance Clinic, Inc. · 467 So. 2d 998 - Florida Bar v. Hawkins
Decided 1990-09-18