Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 568 S.W.2d 232 - Brewster v. Commonwealth

Brewster v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Gall v. Parker (2000), Tamme v. Commonwealth (1998)

1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

16019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sheppard v. Maxwell · Estes v. Texas · McDonald v. Commonwealth · Spencer v. Commonwealth · Short v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he mere fact that jurors may have heard, talked, or read about a case does not require a change of venue, absent a showing that there is a reasonable likelihood that the accounts or descriptions of the investigation and judicial proceedings have prejudiced the defendant.... Prejudice must be shown unless it may be clearly implied in a given case from the totality of the circumstances.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “if it appears that the defendant. . . cannot have a fair trial in the county where the prosecution is pending,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Of course, a showing of actual prejudice is unnecessary if the procedure involves such a probability that prejudice will result that it is deemed inherently lacking in due process. Estes v. Texas, 381 U.S. 532 , 85 S.Ct. 1628 , 14 L.Ed.2d 543 (1965)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.