Marx v. General Revenue Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
568 U.S. 371 · 2013
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 7 district · 8 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 2607 · 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 6104 · 15 U.S.C. § 77K (§ 11 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1928 · 29 U.S.C. § 431
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Caminetti v. United States · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 149 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he canon against surplusage is strongest when an interpretation would render superfluous another part of the same statutory scheme.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The canon against surplusage is not an absolute rule ....”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[t]he force of any negative implication ... depends on context.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.