¶1Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for -writ of mandamus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
568 U.S. 940
In re Sinquefield
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 9, 2012
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 2012-10-09
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLC (2019), Commonwealth v. Brown (2018)
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 27 state decisions
Relies on Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2012-10-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →