In re Shank’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1326 · 11 U.S.C. § 1327 · 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 501 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 507
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Johnson v. Home State Bank · Kontrick v. Ryan · Turner v. Rogers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“notice given directly to, or received personally by a party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rosbottom v. Schiff
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.