Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 569 BR 377 - In re Smiley

In re Smiley’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1408 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Butner v. United States · Nobelman v. American Savings Bank · in Re: Stephen McDonald · Davis Allied Credit Corporation v. Davis · In Re: Manuel Ferandos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]ith respect to a particular mortgage, to a lien recorded prior to: (a) the receipt by the association of a summons and complaint in an action to foreclose a mortgage on that unit; or (b) the filing with the proper county recording office of a lis pendens giving notice of an action to foreclose a mortgage on that unit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen recording a lien which may be granted priority pursuant to this act, an association shall notify, in writing, any holder of a first mortgage lien on the property of the filing of the association lien.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Although the legislative history indicates that the 'three categories are mutually exclusive', the Bankruptcy Code is devoid of any language that expressly makes that conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.