Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 569 F.2d 1078 - United States v. Boettjer

United States v. Boettjer’s Empirical Analysis

569 F.2d 1078 · 1978

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2017

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

5019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 802 (§ 102 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 822 (§ 302 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 829 (§ 309 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Hamling v. United States · United States v. Moore · United States v. Sealy, Inc. · G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United States · United States v. Rosenberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “other than in good faith for a legitimate medical purpose and in accordance with the medical standards generally recognized and accepted in the medical profession.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when their activities fall outside the usual course of professional practice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a) Except as authorized by this subchapter, it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally— (1) to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled substance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.