Kendall v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
569 F.2d 1330 · 1978
Citation profile
23 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Trufant v. Autocon, Inc. (1984), United States v. Forcellati (1979)
23 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3401 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · United States v. Haley · United States v. Cline
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because no final decision of a district court has been rendered in this case and because no other statute authorizes direct appeal of the magistrate's decision under these circumstances, we have no jurisdiction to hear this appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“but his findings and recommendations are to be supervised and reviewed by the district court, which then enters judgment. F.R.Civ.P. 53(e). The magistrate's decision prior to the district court's review is not a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“as a special master in any civil case, upon consent of the parties,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.