Jacquet v. Westerfield’s Empirical Analysis
569 F.2d 1339 · 1978
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2008 · most notably West v. Bergland (1979), United States v. Frame (1989)
17 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · Rosado v. Wyman · King v. Smith · Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc. · Jefferson v. Hackney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“acquire fraudulently more than his entitlement at the expense of other families benefiting from the AFDC program.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Deel v. Lukhard · Deel v. Jackson“If some welfare recipients obtain more than their rightful share of these finite resources through fraud, it is mathematically certain that other needy, dependent children whose families accurately reported their income and resources must be affected .... The recoupment regulations (are) an administrative tool designed to assure a fair distribution of the state’s limited funds, . ..”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“That a later Congress seeks to grant expressly a power which an earlier Congress has granted by implication does not negate the existence of the power prior to the express grant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.