Poppa v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
569 F.3d 1167 · 2009
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Newbold v. Colvin (2013), Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States (2011)
4 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Williams v. Bowen · Doyal v. Barnhart · Hamlin v. Barnhart · Qualls v. Apfel · Glass v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he ALJ must investigate and elicit a reasonable explanation for any conflict between the Dictionary [of Occupational Titles] and expert testimony before the ALJ may rely on the expert's testimony as substantial evidence to support a determination of nondisability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“requires that an ALJ must inquire about and resolve any conflicts between a [VE's] testimony regarding a job and the description of that job in the [DOT]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]sk the VE ... if the evidence he or she has provided conflicts with information provided in the DOT.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.