United States v. Eckhart’s Empirical Analysis
569 F.3d 1263 · 2009
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2024 · most notably United States v. Polly (2011), United States v. Albert (2009)
12 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Delaware v. Prouse · United States v. Guest · Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The proponent of a motion to suppress has the burden of adducing facts at the suppression hearing indicating that his own rights were violated by the challenged search.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“bears the burden of establishing that he gained possession from the owner or someone with authority to grant possession.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he typical police-citizen encounter envisioned by the Court in Terry usually involves no more than a very brief detention without the aid of weapons or handcuffs, a few questions relating to identity and the suspicious circumstances, and an atmosphere that is substantially less police dominated than that surrounding the kinds of interrogation at issue in Miranda .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.