Larson v. Correct Craft, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
569 F.3d 1319 · 2009
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 35 U.S.C. § 256
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp. · Bender v. Williamsport Area School District · Jenkins v. McKeithen · Mitchell v. Maurer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a plaintiff seeking correction of inventorship under § 256 can pursue that claim in federal court only if the requirements for constitutional standing -- namely injury, causation, and redress ability -- are satisfied.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) Correction — Whenever through error a person is named in an issued patent as the inventor, or through error an inventor is not named in an issued patent, the Director may, on application of all the parties and assignees, with proof of the facts and such other requirements as may be imposed, issue a certificate correcting such error. (b) Patent valid if error corrected — The error of omitting inventors or naming persons who are not inventors shall not invalidate the patent in which such error occurred if it can be corrected as provided in this section. The court before which such matter is called in question may order correction of the patent on notice and hearing of all parties concerned and the Director shall issue a certificate accordingly. 5”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]f the jurisdiction-conferring patent claim is dismissed for lack of standing, the district court cannot exercise supplemental jurisdiction over surviving state-law claims because there was never an Article III case or controversy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.