Rendelman v. Rouse’s Empirical Analysis
569 F.3d 182 · 2009
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Sharp v. Johnson (2012), Kuperman v. Wrenn (2011)
10 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 876 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools · South Dakota v. Dole · Guardians Association v. Civil Service Commission of City of New York · Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When Congress desires to impose a condition under the spending clause, it is Congress' burden to affirmatively impose the condition in clear and unmistakable statutory terms. We conclude therefore that . . . Congress did not signal with sufficient clarity an intent to subject such a person to an individual capacity damages claim under [the statute].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(i) a State, county, municipality, or other governmental entity created under the authority of a State; (ii) any branch, department, agency, in- strumentality, or official of an entity listed in clause (i); and (ii) any other person acting under color of State law[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sharp v. Johnson“[A]s a general rule, a prisoner's transfer or release from a particular prison moots his claims for injunctive and declaratory relief with respect to his incarceration there.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.