Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 569 F.3d 40 - Johnson v. Rowley

Johnson v. Rowley’s Empirical Analysis

569 F.3d 40 · 2009

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
May 2024
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc. (2011), Hayden v. Paterson (2010)

12 federal appellate · 4 district ·

820200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Jones v. Bock · Woodford v. Ngo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “accept all factual allegations in the complaint as true and draw all reasonable inferences in [the plaintiffs'] favor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “BOP’s procedural rules ... ereate[ ] a four-step administrative grievance system for prisoner complaints. The first step require[s] inmates to “present an issue of concern informally” to the prison staff so that they could attempt to resolve it. If the issue remain[s] unresolved, the inmate c[an] submit “a formal written Administrative Remedy Request” to the institution staff member designated to receive such requests. The inmate c[an] appeal any adverse decision made at that stage to the Regional Director, and then to the BOP’s General Counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.