Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

569 F. App'x 163

Stine v. Doe

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 29, 2014

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2014-04-29

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Decided 2014-04-29

PER CURIAM:

¶1Mikeal Stine and Jeremy Pinson appeal the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012) their complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Stine v. Doe, No. 5:13-ct-03279-D, 2014 WL 229343 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2DISMISSED.

/569/fappx/163 · .json · Public domain