569 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Wolf v. Central Intelligence Agency’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
18 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 44 U.S.C. § 2101 · 44 U.S.C. § 3101 · 44 U.S.C. § 3301 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 50 U.S.C. § 431 (§ 701 of the National Security Act of 1947)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Foman v. Davis · SafeCard Services, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Oglesby v. United States Department of the Army
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because such a search would be unduly burdensome and exceed the requirements of FOIA”). 27 . The FOIA request that contains this alternative request is incorporated by reference in the First Amended Complaint. See FAC ¶ 42, NSC II. 28 . In fact, the Executive Office for the U.S. Attorneys”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“should be denied where an agency’s declarations are reasonably detailed, submitted in good faith and the court is satisfied that no factual dispute remains.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a detailed explanation by the agency regarding the time and expense of a proposed search,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.