Davis v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
9 district ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7421 · 26 U.S.C. § 7431 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 452 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Conley v. Gibson · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Kentucky v. Graham · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“this repetitive presentation of essentially identical claims wastes limited judicial resources,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.