Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 569 N.E.2d 349 - Hinkle v. State

Hinkle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schiro v. State · Schiro v. Indiana · Burkes v. State · Ward v. State · Lane v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[In order to constitute fundamental error, an error must be blatant and the potential harm must be so substantial and apparent that to ignore it would clearly constitute a denial of due process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.