Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Zickefoose v. State · State Ex Rel. Keller v. Criminal Ct. of Marion Cty. · Hammons v. State · Page v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A person who knowingly or intentionally: (1) confines another person without the other person's consent; or (2) removes another person, by fraud, enticement, force, or threat of force, from one (1) place to another; commits criminal confinement, a Class D felony. However, the offense is a Class C felony if the other person is less than fourteen (14) years of age and is not the person's child...."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burdine v. State“a crime when engaging in conduct that constitutes a substantial step toward commission of a crime, acting with the same degree of culpability required to commit the crime. IND.CODE § 85-41-5-1 (1988); Moore v. State (1991), Ind.App., 569 N.E.2d 695, 701 . The determination of what constitutes a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burdine v. State“The explanation cannot merely recite the statutory factors, but must relate in some detail the facts peculiar to the défendant and the crime-thereby assuring the sentence was fair and reasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lawson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.