Newbauer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1996
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pawloski v. State · Williams v. State · Johnston v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Detective Hilligoss' testimony, while explaining the basis for his decision, was nevertheless hearsay. Unlike the testimony in Head, Hilligoss' statement was sufficiently specific and detailed to provide the jury with a basis for making inferences that the informant had knowledge that appellant committed the offense and that appellant was therefore guilty as charged. Appellant, however, was provided with no opportunity to test these inferences through cross-examination."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bonner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.